home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
caps
/
60s
/
60coldw
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
25KB
|
491 lines
<text id=93HT0330>
<link 93XP0403>
<link 93XP0199>
<link 89TT3062>
<title>
1960s: Cold War Contained
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1960s Highlights
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
Cold War Contained
</hdr>
<body>
<p> [At the start of the 1960s, the world still trembled under the
pall of atomic terror, and the very real possibility of nuclear
war with the Soviet Union dominated the foreign policy
deliberations of the U.S. and other Free World nations. At
borders and trouble spots from Europe's Iron Curtain to Korea's
Demilitarized Zone, wherever the superpowers or their allies and
satellites confronted each other, the threat hovered in the
background.
</p>
<p> But there were hints of thaw. The two countries had managed
to observe an informal moratorium on nuclear test since 1958.
After Vice President Nixon toured the Soviet Union and
Khrushchev met with President Eisenhower at Camp David in 1959,
the two countries agreed to attend a summit meeting in Paris the
following May. Only eleven days before the conference,
Khrushchev announced with unconcealed glee that the Soviets had
shot down an American spy plane over Russian territory.]
</p>
<p>(May 16, 1960)
</p>
<p> The low black plane with the high tail looked out of place
among the shiny military jets crowding the U.S. Air Force base
at Incirlik, near Adana, Turkey. Its wide wings drooped with
delicate languor--like a squatting seagull, too spent to fly.
Its pilot seemed equally odd: a dark, aloof young man who wore
a regulation flying suit and helmet but no markings, and had a
revolver on his hip. Pilot Francis Gary Powers, 30, climbed into
the one-man cockpit, gunned the black ship's single engine, and
as the plane climbed toward takeoff speed, the wide wings
stiffened and the awkward outrigger wheels that had served as
ground support dropped away.
</p>
<p> Steadily the plane climbed--beyond the ceiling of transports,
beyond the ceiling of bombers and interceptors, up through
60,000 ft., beyond the reach of any other operational craft and,
as far as the pilot knew, of antiaircraft fire as well.
</p>
<p> Francis Powers was on an intelligence mission, like many
unsung pilots before him.
</p>
<p> But Pilot Powers had bad luck: he got caught, and Soviet
Premier Nikita Khrushchev says that he talked. Thus Khrushchev
had the chance to tell the world about the U-2's mission last
week--with all the embellishment and distortion that best
suited his case.
</p>
<p> After taking off from his base in Turkey on April 27, said
Khrushchev, Powers flew across the southern boundary of the
U.S.S.R. to Peshawar in Pakistan. From there, on May 1, he took
off on a reconnaissance flight that was supposed to take him up
the Ural Mountains to Murmansk on the Kola Peninsula to a
landing in Norway. Soviet radar tracked him all the way, and
over Sverdlovsk, on Khrushchev's personal order, he was shot
down at 65,000 ft. by a Soviet ground-to-air rocket. Pilot
Powers, said Khrushchev, declined to fire his ejection seat
because that would have blown up his plane, its instrumentation
and possibly Powers himself. Instead, he climbed out of his
cockpit, parachuted to earth and was captured, while his plane
crashed near by.
</p>
<p> [Although Eisenhower insisted on assuming full responsibility
for Powers' flight, he refused to yield to Khrushchev's demand
in Paris for an abject apology, and the summit collapsed.
</p>
<p> As revolutionary Cuba under the rule of Fidel Castro emerged
as a Communist tyranny and Soviet satellite, the U.S. stood by
helplessly, unwilling to incur world disapprobation by forcibly
intervening in Latin America yet again. But when John Kennedy
took office in 1961, he learned that the CIA had been training
Cuban counterrevolutionaries for an invasion of the island. He
had deep misgivings about the plan, but reluctantly went along.]
</p>
<p>(April 28, 1961)
</p>
<p> At the Bay of Pigs, on Cuba's south coast, a force of 1,300
well-armed, well-trained anti-Castro freedom fighters last week
launched a major campaign to rid their homeland of Communist
dictatorship. They were defeated within two days by a
better-armed, better-led enemy, who withstood their attack and
delivered a crushing counterblow. The defeat, as all the world
sensed, was a tragedy not only for Cuba's exiles.
</p>
<p> The operation started with a surprise attack by B-26 light
bombers on Cuban airports where Russian MIG-15s were reportedly
being uncrated and assembled. In the best cloak and dagger
tradition, to lend credence to a cover story that the bombings
were by pilots defecting from Castro's air force, a few .30-cal.
bullets were fired into an old Cuban B-26. A pilot took off in
the crate and landed it at Miami with a cock-and-bull story that
he had attacked the airfields.
</p>
<p> After midnight, in simultaneous landings at three beaches on
the Bay of Pigs, 90 miles southeast of Havana, the attackers
went in with artillery, tanks and B-26 air support. Soon
afterward, Castro's military duty officer at Jaguey Grande
reported fighting on the beach.
</p>
<p> The expected mass uprising failed to take place, and the tide
of rebellion ran out. The airstrip at Jaguey Grande was seized,
but when the first rebel B-26 came in to land, it hit unexpected
ridges of sand that had drifted across the runway, and crashed.
Paratroopers, dropped inland, were wiped out--few prisoners
were taken. The invaders from the beach never quite reached
Jaguey Grande. Obviously forewarned of the general area where the
landing would take place ("Someone committed treason," charged
a council member), Castro had 10,000 troops on hand to meet the
men coming up the track bed. Heavy artillery pinned the invaders
down. The invasion ship carrying all the broadcasting equipment
was sunk, and with it another landing craft. The Castro command
threw its Soviet-built T-34 tanks into the fight: a dozen jets,
some of them MIGs flown by Czech pilots, shot down five of the
invaders' twelve B-26 bombers. Other Castro aircraft swept over
the exposed troops in strafing runs. A desperate call for help
went out from the beachhead: "We are under attack by two Sea
Fury aircraft and heavy artillery. Do not see any friendly air
cover as you promised. Need jet support immediately."
</p>
<p> The support never came. Foot by foot, the anti-Castro forces
were driven back down the road and railroad bed toward the Bay
of Pigs. A few soldiers scattered across the swamps in a
desperate attempt to reach the hills of Escambray, 50 miles
away. A radio ham in New Jersey picked up a faint signal: "This
is Cuba calling Where will help come from? This is Cuba calling
the free world. We need help in Cuba." In Miami, Miro Cardona
and the Revolutionary Council finally broke silence to issue a
statement. They had radioed the men at the Bay of Pigs to ask
whether they wished to be evacuated. The answer: "We will never
leave this island."
</p>
<p> The lessons of Cuba came with jolting swiftness. Again,
Kennedy underestimated his adversary and overestimated the
realism of his own expectations. In backing the invasion of Cuba
by a force of U.S.-trained Cuban exiles, Kennedy hoped to bring
down Fidel Castro's Communist regime in Cuba without stirring
too many international accusations of "imperialism" and
"colonialism" against the U.S. But the bungled invasion ended
in a massacre. And the onlooking nations blamed the U.S. for the
invasion almost as shrilly as if Kennedy had sent in the
Marines.
</p>
<p> [Still smarting from his defeat, Kennedy met in Vienna with
Soviet Leader Khrushchev, who tried to bully him by threatening
to sign a separate peace treaty with the East Germans that would
cut off Western access to Berlin. The Communists would in any
case have had to do something about Berlin, where East Germany's
population was hemorrhaging to the West through the Free City's
relatively porous frontier.]
</p>
<p>(August 25, 1961)
</p>
<p> The scream of sirens and the clank of steel on cobblestones
echoed down the mean, dark streets. Frightened East Berliners
peeked from behind their curtains to see military convoys
stretching for blocks. At each major intersection, a platoon
peeled off and ground to a halt, guns at the ready.
</p>
<p> As the troops arrived at scores of border points, cargo trucks
were already unloading rolls of barbed wire, concrete, posts,
wooden horses, stone blocks, picks and shovels. When dawn came
four hours later, a wall divided East Berlin from West for the
first time in eight years.
</p>
<p> The wall was illegal, immoral and strangely revealing--illegal because it violated the Communists' solemn contracts to
permit free movement throughout the city; immoral because it
virtually jailed millions of innocent people; revealing because
it advertised to all the world the failure of East Germany's
Communist system, and the abject misery of a people who could
only be kept within its borders by bullets, bayonets and
barricades.
</p>
<p> For Walter Ulbricht, East Germany's goat-bearded, Communist
boss, the wall was utterly necessary to preserve the very life
of his dismal satrapy. For seldom had history witnessed so great
an exodus as had been flowing Westward in great clotted spurts.
"You are sharing in the Great Socialist Experiment," Ulbricht
cried to his people in 1949, as he cut their food ration and
trimmed away their liberties. Far from sharing Ulbricht's
enthusiasm, almost 3,500,000 East Germans--no less than 20% of
the post-World War II population--fled to the West in the
eleven years that followed. In the first eleven days of August
1961 alone, 16,500 sought haven in West Berlin; the refugees
included an East German Supreme Court judge, East German
policemen, soldiers, physicians, lawyers, engineers, farmers,
workers, merchants--the lifeblood of any country.
</p>
<p> [Moscow's next aggressive move was to abrogate the informal
moratorium on nuclear testing.]
</p>
<p>(September 8, 1961)
</p>
<p> Moscow's millions knew something was afoot even as they awoke
and dressed for work one morning last week. The radio was
droning out the full text of a long government communique. First
came the strident buildup: "The United States and its allies are
fanning up the arms race...preparing a new world holocaust
while the Soviet government strives for peace. The Soviet Union
considers it its duty to take all necessary measures..."
Slowly, as the high-charge prose unwound, the reason for all the
excitement began to dawn on the Muscovites: the Kremlin had
decided to start testing its nuclear weapons again. Just 49
hours later, a brilliant flash lit the bleak plains of Central
Asia, and a mighty bang echoed for miles.
</p>
<p> Bluntly, the government declared that Russian scientists were
working on "super-powerful" bombs in the 100-megaton range (the
equivalent of 100 million tons of TNT), made to fit rockets
"similar to those used by Major Y.A. Gagarin and Major G.S.
Titov for their unrivaled cosmic flights." In case somebody
missed the point, Russia's army newspaper Red Star explained
that nuclear weapons of such power could wipe out anyone
anywhere: "No super-deep shelter can save them from an all-
shattering blow from this weapon."
</p>
<p> As students of psychological warfare, the Russians well knew
that they risked being branded as enemies of peace by the bloc
of neutral nations coveted by both East and West. But as a man
who lives by power, Khrushchev was forced by the requirements
of power to take that chance. Russia badly needed to test its
family of nuclear weapons. In particular, Russian scientists
needed to test small, limited-yield battlefield weapons, a
category in which the Soviet Union is thought to trail far
behind the U.S. Moreover, Khrushchev was gambling that this
ruthless maneuver would intimidate the U.S., weaken the resolve
of the Western Allies, and scare the East Germans into
submission.
</p>
<p> The Soviet announcement of new nuclear test did indeed hand
the U.S. a major propaganda victory.
</p>
<p> In the cold war of nerves, the U.S. had won its bet that it
could outlast the Russians at the test-ban conference table--the "bladder technique," as the approach was called by U.S.
Negotiator Arthur Dean.
</p>
<p> [President Kennedy tried to persuade the Soviets to work
toward a test-ban treaty at Geneva, but eventually decided that
the U.S. would have to resume atmospheric testing in the Pacific
in order not to be left behind in the arms race.]
</p>
<p>(May 4, 1962)
</p>
<p> Dawn's first light broke through a heavy haze, diffusing
Christmas Island's end-of-the-world ugliness. The barren
stretches of sand and scrub, the grey hulls of freighters and
barges in the tiny harbor, the naked steel testing towers, the
exposed beams of half-completed buildings, all took on a weird
beauty. In a small operations building, about 15 technicians sat
amid the coffee-cup litter of a sleepless night. Alone in a
darkened room, an electronics technician pressed a microphone
switch and began the countdown on Operation Dominic--the U.S.
series of nuclear tests in the atmosphere that the free world
did not want, but for its survival's sake could not avoid. At
5:45 a.m., the countdown reached zero. The B-52 dropped its
payload. A flash pierced the haze. The tests had begun.
</p>
<p> [In October 1962, U.S. intelligence obtained evidence that
the Soviets, in their most brazen act yet, were building
missile emplacements in Cuba. It was the biggest crisis of
Kennedy's presidency.
</p>
<p> "There was danger in standing still or moving forward. I
thought it was the wisest policy to risk that which was incident
to the latter course."
</p>
<p>-- James Monroe to Thomas Jefferson (1822)]
</p>
<p>(November 2, 1962)
</p>
<p> Last week that perilous choice confronted another, younger
President of the U.S. Generations to come may well count John
Kennedy's resolve as one of the decisive moments of the 20th
century. For Kennedy determined to moved forward at whatever
risk. And when faced by that determination, the bellicose
Premier of the Soviet Union first wavered, then weaseled and
finally backed down.
</p>
<p> To Kennedy, the time of truth arrived when he received sheaves
of photographs taken during the preceding few days by U.S.
reconnaissance planes over Cuba. They furnished staggering proof
of a massive, breakneck buildup of Soviet missile power on
Casto's island. Already poised were missiles capable of hurling
a megaton each--or roughly 50 times the destructive power of
the Hiroshima atomic bomb--at the U.S. Under construction were
sites for launching five-megaton missiles.
</p>
<p> As if by magic, thick woods had been torn down, empty fields
were clustered with concrete mixing plants, fuel tanks and mess
halls. Chillingly clear to the expert eye were some 40 slim,
52-ft. medium-range missiles, many of them already angled up on
their mobile launchers and pointed at the U.S. mainland. With
an estimated range of 1,200 miles, these missiles, armed with
one-megaton warheads, could reach Houston, St. Louis--or
Washington. The bases were located at about ten spots, including
Sagua la Grande and Remedios on the northern coast, and San
Cristobal and Guanajay on the western end of the island. Under
construction were a half-dozen bases for 2,500-mile missiles,
which could smash U.S. cities from coast to coast. In addition,
the films showed that the Russians had moved in at least 25
twin-jet bombers that could carry nuclear bombs.
</p>
<p> But why? More and more in Kennedy's mind, the Cuban crisis
became linked with impending crisis in Berlin--and with an
all-out Khrushchev effort to upset the entire power balance of
the cold war. He hoped to present the U.S. with a fait accompli,
carried out while the U.S. was totally preoccupied--or so, at
least, Khrushchev supposed--with its upcoming elections. If he
got away with it, he could presume that the Kennedy
Administration was so weak and fearful that he could take over
Berlin with impunity.
</p>
<p> Kennedy shattered those illusions. He did it with a series of
dramatic decisions that swiftly brought the U.S. to a showdown
not with Fidel Castro but with Khrushchev's own Soviet Union.
Basic to those decisions were two propositions:
</p>
<p> It would not be enough for the Russians to halt missile
shipments to Cuba. Instead, all missiles in Cuba must be
dismantled and removed. If necessary, the U.S. would remove them
by invasion.
</p>
<p> Any aggressive act from Cuba would be treated by the U.S. as
an attack by the Soviet Union itself. And the U.S. would
retaliate against Russia with the sudden and full force of its
thermonuclear might.
</p>
<p> As a first step, and only as a first step, President Kennedy
decided to impose a partial blockade, or quarantine, on Cuba,
stopping all shipments of offensive weapons--ground-to-ground
and air-to-ground missiles, warheads, missile launching
equipment, bombers and bombs. When Kennedy first made known this
plan, there were some complaints that it was not enough. But
Kennedy meant it only to give Khrushchev an opportunity to think
things over; more precipitant action by the U.S., Kennedy felt,
might cause Khrushchev to lurch wildly into nuclear war. The
decision to start with the quarantine also gave the U.S. time
to rally support in Latin America and forestall criticism that
Europeans might have directed at an immediate invasion.
</p>
<p> President Kennedy announced his decisions on television to a
somber nation and found that nation overwhelmingly behind him.
From the governments of the U.S.'s allies in NATO and SEATO too
came strong, heartening assurances of support. At a Washington
meeting of the Organization of American States, the delegates
by a vote of 20 to 0 adopted a resolution calling for the
"immediate dismantling and withdrawal from Cuba of all missiles."
</p>
<p> Against this surge of feeling, Khrushchev reacted hesitantly.
Twelve hours after Kennedy's speech, the Kremlin issued a
cautiously worded statement. Then Khrushchev sent a peace-
rattling message to British Pacifist Bertrand Russell. Next,
Khrushchev grasped eagerly at a suggestion by U Thant, Acting
Secretry-General of the United Nations, for a two or three weeks
"suspension," with Russia halting missile shipments to Cuba and
Kennedy lifting the blockade. Kennedy politely declined, writing
U Thant: "The existing threat was created by the secret
introduction of offensive weapons into Cuba, and the answer lies
in the removal of such weapons."
</p>
<p> But Khrushchev had one more trick up his sleeve. He offered
to take his missile bases out of Cuba if the U.S. would dismantle
its missile bases in Turkey. With a speed that must have
bewildered Khrushchev, the President refused.
</p>
<p> That did it. Early Sunday morning came the word from Moscow
Radio that Khrushchev had sent a new message to Kennedy. In it,
Khrushchev complained about a U-2 flight over Russia on Oct. 28,
groused about the continuing "violation" of Cuban airspace. But,
he said, he had noted Kennedy's assurances that no invasion of
Cuba would take place if all offensive weapons were removed.
Hence, wrote Khrushchev, the Soviet Government had "issued a new
order for the dismantling of the weapons, which you describe as
offensive, their crating and returning to the Soviet Union."
Finally, he offered to let United Nations representatives verify
the removal of the missiles.
</p>
<p> [With defeat, coupled with the steady worsening of the split
between the Soviet and Chinese Communist camps, came a change
of attitude on the part of the Soviets. Within months, all was
cooperation at the arms talks, and a partial test-ban treaty was
negotiated.]
</p>
<p>(August 2, 1963)
</p>
<p> Around a green baize table sat U.S. Secretary for Political
Affairs W. Averell Harriman, British Science Minister Lord
Hailsham and Russia's Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko. At each
man's elbow was a copy of the agreement, initialed a few minutes
earlier--WAH, H and AT.
</p>
<p> The atmosphere was jovial. "Let us pretend we are discussing
something," said AT for the benefit of photographers.
Volunteered H: "I'll make my famous speech in Russian." He
grinned but said nothing, since he speaks no Russian. Suddenly
finding a microphone in front of his face, WAH declared: "The
treaty is a very important step forward in many respects. It
provides the possibility of further steps."
</p>
<p> The big, unanswered and for the present unanswerable question
is where the further steps may lead. It may or may not be a
major turning point in the cold war. Given all the bitter
memories of Communist deceit and broken pledges, all the past
"peace offensives" that only served to aggravate the battle, no
one can discount the possibility that the test ban agreement
will only serve to give the Russians a breather in their
struggle with the West, to be resumed later with even more
ferocity. Still, the evidence points to a more hopeful
interpretation.
</p>
<p> The Moscow agreement itself is simple--some feel too simple.
In 800 refreshingly brief words, the U.S., Britain and the
Soviet Union agree to "prohibit, to prevent and not to carry out
any nuclear weapons test explosion or any other nuclear
explosion" in the atmosphere, outer space or under water, the
treaty to be of "indefinite duration."
</p>
<p> The biggest significance of the treaty is probably symbolic.
History will note, after all, that Year 21 of the Atomic Age
had brought a reaching out, however guarded, across the chasm,
the first concrete move, however small, by both East and West
to control the thought-defying force that had been unbound.
</p>
<p> Between them, the three major nuclear powers had set off 425
announced test blasts with 545 megatons of destruction--more
than enough to destroy civilization. For 15 years of
nerve-racking cold war and five years of futile, frustrating
negotiations, fear and reason had not been enough to halt the
weapons race. The test ban, though it may accomplish little
else, at least suggests that fear and reason, those eminently
constructive forces, can still operate with some success in
human affairs.
</p>
<p> [With the test-ban treaty, the pall over the world from the
threat of nuclear annihilation receded decisively, never since
then to lie so heavily over the superpowers' deliberations.
</p>
<p> Nikita Khrushchev paid the price for his mistakes a year
later. Unlike his predecessors, however, he was not tried,
imprisoned or murdered. He lived in seclusion on his dacha until
his death in 1971.]
</p>
<p>(October 23, 1964)
</p>
<p> Shortly after midnight, Tass tersely announced it. Nikita
Khrushchev had been "released" from all his duties "at his own
request" for reasons of "age and deteriorating health." His
successors were named and congratulated: Leonid Brezhnev, 57,
Secretary of the Central Committee, and Alekesi Kosygin, 60, who
had served as First Deputy Premier.
</p>
<p> Exactly how it happened might not be clear for weeks or
months, or indeed ever, but the official announcements added up
to this much: there had been two meetings, one of the powerful
170-member Central Committee, which usually convenes in a
cramped Kremlin conference room, and the other next day of the
30-member Presidium of the Supreme Soviet. The inference was
that Khrushchev had been present at both sessions. At the
Central Committee meeting, Mikhail Suslov, an ideologue who had
once been a Stalinist but has more recently served as
Khrushchev's polemical hatchet man in the fight with Peking,
read a speech that contained the party's accusations against
Nikita--nepotism, fostering a personality cult, and errors of
policy toward China.
</p>
<p> Both Brezhnev and Kosygin were handpicked by Nikita to
buttress his domain, and consequently in the past they
represented many of his own ideas and methods. On the face of
it, they now stand for "Khrushchevism" without Khrushchev--the
same show run more smartly, more carefully, with the old
irritant out of the way.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>